HIV/AIDS Resource Home
|
|
In Maryland, providing rapid HIV testing and
implementing SISTA (Sisters Informing Sisters About Topics on
AIDS ), a program designed to increase the number of African
American women who can negotiate condom use with their male
partners. |
|
|
In California, offering counseling, rapid testing
services, referral and other services to minority women 13 years
of age and older to decrease the transmission of HIV and to
increase awareness of serostatus and linkages to prevention and
treatment services. |
|
|
In Illinois, focusing on African American women
through prevention case management, SISTA, and Safety Counts,
which is an HIV prevention intervention for active injection
drug and crack cocaine users. |
CDC also funds research on interventions to reduce HIV-related risk behavior or biologic outcomes. For example, the Women and Infants Demonstration Projects were focused on low income, inner-city sexually active women to measure injection drug use, sexual behaviors, and HIV testing behaviors, as well as sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. The demonstration projects increased condom use and resulted in an intervention package called Real AIDS Prevention Project, which is available, with training and technical assistance, from CDC.
To prevent mother to child transmission, since 1999, CDC has distributed $10 million annually to 16 states with high HIV/AIDS rates to carry out prevention programs for pregnant women, to 10 states for enhanced surveillance for infected mothers and babies, and to 5 national organizations to develop and distribute training and educational materials for women and prenatal care providers.
Understanding HIV and AIDS Data
Understanding AIDS surveillance: Through a uniform system, CDC receives reports of AIDS cases from all US states and territories. Since the beginning of the epidemic, these data have been used to monitor trends because they are representative of all areas. The data are statistically adjusted for reporting delays and for the redistribution of cases initially reported without risk. As treatment has become more available, trends in new AIDS diagnoses no longer accurately represent trends in new HIV infections; these data now represent persons who are tested late in the course of HIV infection, who have limited access to care, or in whom treatment has failed.
HIV surveillance: Monitoring trends in the HIV epidemic today requires collecting information on HIV cases that have not progressed to AIDS. Areas with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting requirements use the same uniform system for data collection on HIV cases as for AIDS cases. The US Virgin Islands and 32 states (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming) have collected these data for at least 5 years, providing sufficient data to monitor HIV trends and estimate risk behaviors for HIV infection.
HIV/AIDS: This term includes persons with a
diagnosis of HIV infection (not AIDS), a diagnosis of HIV infection
and a later diagnosis of AIDS, or concurrent diagnoses of HIV
infection and AIDS.
References
| 1. |
Anderson RN,
Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2001.
National
Vital Statistics Reports
2003;52(9):32–33,53–54. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_09.pdf.
Accessed November 9, 2004. |
| 2. |
CDC.
HIV/AIDS
Surveillance Report 2003; (Vol. 15). Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human
Services, CDC. In press. |
| 3. |
CDC.
HIV/AIDS
Surveillance Report 1998;10(No. 2):1–43. Also available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasrlink.htm. Accessed August 26, 2004. |
| 4. |
McNaghten AD,
Hanson DL, Aponte Z, Sullivan P, Wolfe MI. Gender disparity in
HIV treatment and AIDS opportunistic illnesses (OI). XV
International Conference on AIDS; July 2004; Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract MoOrC1032. |
| 5. |
US Census
Bureau. Census Brief: Women in the United States: a profile.
March 2000. Available at
http://www.census.gov/prod/ 2000pubs/cenbr001.pdf. Accessed
August 27, 2004. |
| 6. |
Valleroy L,
MacKellar D, Karon J, et al. HIV infection in disadvantaged out-ofschool
youth: prevalence for U.S. Job Corps entrants, 1990 through
1996.
Journal of
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 1998;19:67–73. |
| 7. |
Lee LM, Fleming
PL. Trends in human immunodeficiency virus diagnoses among women
in the United States, 1994–1998.
Journal of
the American Medical Women’s Association
2001;56(3):94–99. |
| 8. |
Hader S, Smith
DK, Moore JS, Holmberg SD. HIV infection in women in the United
States: status at the millennium.
JAMA 2001; 285:1186–1192. |
| 9. |
Montgomery JP, Mokotoff ED, Gentry AC, Blair JM. The extent
of bisexual behaviour in HIV-infected men and implications for
transmission to their female partners.
AIDS Care
2003;15:829–837. |
| 10. |
Valleroy LA,
MacKellar DA, Behel SK, et al. The bridge for HIV transmission
to women from 23- to 29-year-old men who have sex with men in 6
U.S. cities. National HIV Prevention Conference; July 2003;
Atlanta, Georgia. Abstract M2-B0902. |
| 11. |
Suarez-Al-Adam
M, Raffealli M, O’Leary A. influence of abuse and partner hyper-
masculinity on the sexual behavior of Latinas.
AIDS
Education and Prevention
2000;12: 263–274. |
| 12. | Miller KS, Clark LF, Moore JS. Sexual initiation with older male partners and subsequent HIV risk behavior among female adolescents. Family Planning Perspectives 1997;29: 212–214. |
| 13. |
European Study
Group. Comparison of female to male and male to female
transmission of HIV in 563 stable couples.
British
Medical Journal
1992;304:809–813. |
| 14. |
Fleming D,
Wasserheit J. From epidemiological synergy to public health
policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually
transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection.
Sexually Transmitted Infections
1999;75:3–17. |
| 15. |
CDC.
Sexually
Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2003. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human
Services, September 2004. Also available at
http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/toc2003.htm. Accessed November
30, 2004. |
| 16. |
Edlin BR, Irwin
KL, Faruque S, et al. Intersecting epidemics—crack cocaine use
and HIV infection among inner-city young adults.
New England
Journal of Medicine
1994;331: 1422–1427. |
| 17. |
Leigh B, Stall
R. Substance use and risky sexual behavior for exposure to HIV:
issues in methodology, interpretation and prevention.
American
Psychologist
1993;48:1035–1045. |
| 18. |
US Census
Bureau. Poverty: 1999. Census 2000 Brief. Issued May 2003.
Available at
http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/ c2kbr-19.pdf. Accessed
September 16, 2004. |
| 19. |
Diaz T, Chu S,
Buehler J, et al. Socioeconomic differences among people with
AIDS: results from a multistate surveillance project.
American
Journal of Preventive Medicine
1994;10:217–222. |
| 20. | Shapiro MF, Morton SC, McCaffrey DF, et al. Variations in the care of HIV-infected adults in the United States: results from the HIV cost and utilization study. JAMA 1999;281: 2305–2315. |
228 S. Muskogee Avenue Tahlequah, OK 74464
Telephone: 918-456-6094
Fax: 918-456-8128
Email: peiron@niwhrc.org